You Have Been Lied To This Whole Time, Then Vilified If You Ask Too Many Revealing Questions About Those Lies
Reason #12 that Face Masks Hurt Kids
Dear Reader,
The wearing of a face mask to protect against a respiratory virus is an act of grand deceit. It is a behavior that defies research on the topic. Wearing a face mask, as this article (one of many) points to — is unsafe to do and is ineffective.
Until the narrative around mandatory masking has changed, each day by 6am Eastern, I will both post here and send out a science-based reason why no one should wear a face mask.
I ask that you help me circulate these pieces to those around you who you believe could most benefit from them. It is important not to remain silent on this topic. These are important discussions to be having with friends, family members, business owners, healthcare practitioners, public servants, and others in the community.
-Allan
It goes further. Not only do masks not work, not only are you being lied to about it, you are being vilified, cancelled, gaslit, made to seem like a crazy person if you are one of the people who refuse to lie to themselves and instead, ask pointed, revealing questions. Asking pointed, revealing questions is exactly what people tend to do once they are tired of being lied to.
If the lies about face masks were isolated to simply face masks, an argument could be made for there being a small misunderstanding of the science on this one topic that got misconstrued during the fear and concern following the Ides of March 2020.
Only by taking the topic out of context could such a statement
be made.
To contextualize this a little, it is evident that at every turn, people portrayed as trusted experts were duplicitous in their switching of science for politics. They operated not out of a focus on wisdom or data, but out of a spirit of control and the provocation of fear.
San Francisco was the epicenter of the March 17, 2020 lockdown and is the home of a globally recognized public health department known for its comfort and eagerness to experiment on its obedient populace. In a truly amazing summary of the Covid lies of 2020 and 2021, in a piece entitled “The War on Reality,” Alex Gutentag, a public school teacher, writes from San Francisco, California:
“Experts have consistently taken an imprecise approach to statistics, changed their minds, and withheld information while claiming the mantle of ‘scientific consensus.’ Over the summer of 2020, the WHO quietly changed its definition of herd immunity from protection acquired through both natural immunity and vaccination to one acquired only through vaccination. Similarly, in December 2020, Fauci declared that he was changing his estimate for vaccination rates needed to achieve herd immunity from 60% to 90%.”
There was no science behind the WHO decision. In fact, all signs indicate that naturally acquired immunity is superior to vaccine acquired immunity, in terms of length of immunity and quality of immunity. Additionally, there was no science in Fauci’s December 2020 determination.
There is no science that says 90% of a population should be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity. In fact, 0% can be vaccinated and herd immunity can be achieved naturally as humans have always done with all diseases until recently and continue to do so with all but a tiny fraction of diseases. Gutentag illustrates Fauci’s lack of reliance on science:
“When asked for a scientific rationale, Fauci said he changed the percentage based purely on polling that
indicated more Americans were willing to take the Covid-19 vaccine.“When lockdowns failed to yield meaningful mitigation results, public health agencies that had previously recommended against masking changed their position.”
Gutentag goes on to expand on further inconsistencies in “the science” cited by public health officials. This is “science” which is not very scientific in its approach.
“Although simulations suggested that 80% mask compliance would do more to stop the spread of Covid-19 than lockdowns, regional analysis in the United States does not show that mandates had any effect on case rates, despite 93% compliance. Moreover, according to CDC data, 85% of people who contracted Covid-19 reported wearing a mask.
“Research has shown that once unquestioned rules like 6 feet for social distancing are arbitrary and not actually associated with lower transmission. Reporting of death and hospitalization rates was also inexact, and mass asymptomatic testing distorted public understanding of the virus. Ninety-five percent of Covid-19 deaths had an average of four related underlying conditions and the CDC’s death count includes ‘deaths involving unintentional and intentional injury.’ As a result of testing children hospitalized for unrelated conditions, the number of pediatric Covid-19 hospitalizations was exaggerated by at least 40%.”
Not only were the intrusive solutions proposed based on cherry picked bad science, but they did not at all work and led to further distortion of the Covid-19 scare. Gutentag turns her attention to the awful use of the PCR tests for Covid-19 diagnosis.
Without this fraudulent use of a PCR test as a diagnostic tool, the public health crisis of Covid-19 would not have existed because the numbers overstated by the test used to diagnose healthy people would never have been considered Covid cases. Nor would it have been used to highlight Covid as the key concern for sick people with other more pressing medical concerns.
To cite an example that is hard to state too frequently, under the definition of Covid-19 adopted in the US, George Floyd, a man who died on the streets of Minneapolis on May 25, 2020, in a death widely viewed by the world, is a Covid-19 death, having tested positive weeks earlier on April 3, 2020. Gutentag continues about the fraudulent PCR test:
“The PCR testing protocol for Covid-19 was based on a paper by Christian Drosten, which was peer-reviewed and published within just two days in a journal on whose editorial board Drosten sits. The method was created ‘without having virus material available,’ using instead a genetic sequence published online. The PCR test amplifies genetic material of the virus in cycles but does not determine whether a case is infectious. A higher number of cycles indicates a lower viral load. The cycle threshold for PCR tests used in the US was usually limited at 37 or 40, highly sensitive levels. In July 2020, Fauci remarked that at these levels, a positive result is ‘just dead nucleotides, period.’”
As if this were not already bad enough, the CDC stepped into create an apples and oranges scenario so that data from 2020 and 2021 of unvaccinated individuals could never be compared to vaccinated individuals to prove effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a Covid shot.
If honesty were the goal, why would the CDC deny public health researchers that basic tool for determining the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a vaccine? Gutentag continues:
“For vaccinated Americans, the CDC has lowered the cycle threshold for ‘breakthrough infections’ to only 28 cycles and announced that post-vaccine cases will only be counted if they result in hospitalization or death. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky stated that vaccinated Americans who died and tested positive for Covid-19 merely died ‘with’ Covid-19, not ‘from’ Covid-19. This method of tallying would eliminate many pre-vaccine cases. It is also likely that 85%-90% of tests that are positive at a cycle threshold of 40 would be negative at a cycle threshold of 30.
“Despite this lack of accurate data, authorities have consistently scapegoated members of the public as ‘anti-maskers’ or ‘anti-vaxxers’ responsible for prolonging the pandemic. They have used divisive messaging and disorienting scare tactics in order to justify months of Covid-19 restrictions that were based on dogma, not on science.”
Gutentag describes the approach as “saving lives by killing people,” and perhaps a little too generously describes this utter deceit and murder as “scientific inversion,” though she elaborates in a way that minces
no words:
“Our current state of scientific inversion has sown intense division in the US and threatens to rip apart the social fabric. For the past 16 months, the public has been told that it is our duty to serve the needs of medical institutions and personnel, not the other way around. Effective low-cost therapeutics like ivermectin were dismissed in favor of a vaccine program that transferred billions of dollars from taxpayers to pharmaceutical executives and shareholders. Critics of measures like school closures were accused of far-right white supremacy, even though these measures were most damaging to working-class people and minorities. Deadly policies were portrayed as lifesaving, and public health protocols caused immense clinical damage.”
Some benefited by using the medical industrial complex to make a pretty penny in 2020, while others lost out. Gutentag touches on just a tiny fraction of the severe harm caused by allowing government to be hijacked for use in this scheme:
“A few people have benefited from this war on reality while many have paid a heavy price. In 2020, workers lost $3.7 trillion, while billionaires gained $3.9 trillion and 493 new individuals became billionaires. During this same period, decades of progress against diseases like malaria and tuberculosis were reversed. Disruptions to health and nutrition services killed 228,000 children in South Asia. Globally, the impact of lockdowns on health programs, food production, and supply chains plunged millions of people into severe hunger and malnutrition.
“In the US, we are facing a crisis of cardiovascular disease and undiagnosed cancer. Unemployment shock will cause 890,000 additional deaths over the next 15 years. Overdoses from synthetic opioids increased by 38.4%, and 11% of US adults considered suicide last June.
Three million children disappeared from public school systems, and ERs saw a 31% increase in adolescent mental health visits.”
Are these mistakes? Or are these crimes? Was there malice? Was it
intentional? How could it have been anything else and continued for
so long and in so many ways. At the time of this book’s printing there is still a war being diligently fought against any parent, researcher, politician, teacher, or doctor who would dare speak up and demand the scientific method be followed and the risks and rewards thought through.
For doing so, for merely speaking such words, lives are being ruined. Gutentag continues:
“Now, the stories that were used to justify these hardships are continuing to unravel. Many of the people responsible will insist that the second-order consequences are the horrible symptoms of a magic virus and that the mistakes made in handling such a crisis were inevitable. But preventing young children from reaching crucial developmental milestones in the face of mounting evidence is not just a ‘mistake.’ Forcing hospital patients to die alone without saying goodbye to their families is not just a ‘mistake.’ Pushing millions of people into poverty and starvation is not just a ‘mistake.’ These are crimes.
“Basic civil, human, and economic rights were violated
under demonstrably fraudulent pretenses. The sacrifices we thought we were making for the common good were sacrifices made in vain. Unlawful lockdowns demoralized the population and ruined lives. The tragic reality is that
this was all for nothing. The only way to prevent
these events from recurring is to exhaustively investigate not just the origin of the virus, but every corrupt and misguided decision made by politicians, NGOs, public health organizations, and scientific institutions made since its fateful emergence.”
Gutenberg stops with a call for investigations. Every person who
implemented these policies, no matter how great the cost to society, must be removed from any position of public trust and never again granted funding, let alone ever allowed to hold any role of trust. The lies of 2020 and 2021 are so grand and so egregious. The harm committed must
be recompensed.
We must not ever let this go until justice has been done and a full accounting of the ills of 2020 and 2021 has taken place.
The perpetrators realize the harm that will come to them if they lose after so egregiously betraying trust by bringing mass death and harm to the United States and this world, in a never before seen global operation of unprecedented scale.
Thank you to Gutentag for speaking up. This San Francisco school teacher is an unsung American leader and hero who demands praise for the role she has played in 2020 and beyond.
The bestselling book "Face Masks In One Lesson" by Allan Stevo describes how to never wear a face mask again. The follow-up to the book, "Face Masks Hurt Kids," describes why to never wear a face mask again. We must defeat the awful, narrative around the mandates.
Examples of how face masks hurt kids will be posted to the Lockdown Land Substack each morning by 6am Eastern until the narrative around this ineffective and harmful medical intervention has shifted. Face masks are, in fact, not just harmful to children. Face masks are harmful to everyone. Thank you so much for helping me circulate this research.
Thanks for this. I hadn't seen this
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-war-on-reality-gutentag
Instead of We The People, it was, Get Rid of the People...