How to Roll Out the Covid Mandates on Children for Maximum Effectiveness
The Case for School Vaccine Mandates by MLK Day 2023
If you live in California, you may be no more than six months ahead of parents in the other 49 states. A face off is likely ahead on Covid mandates for school attendance. Parents everywhere should be aware of the tactics being employed in California, which has been the testing ground for Covid mandates.
American parents have already overwhelmingly rejected the Covid-19 shot for their children. Vaccine numbers are low and booster numbers show massive disinterest among parents, despite countless high pressure campaigns intended to give parents no other choice. Anyone who wants the shot can easily access it. But that does not seem to be enough.
With decision-makers unwilling to take “No,” for an answer from parents, a sizable percentage of parents are about to be placed in a situation in which they are likely to be left no other choice than to rebel against the Covid-19 mandates.
Guile and manipulation are likely going to be employed to convince parents. All parents will not be convinced. A sizable majority will never comply, so decision-makers recognize that and are focussed on how to convince those who might be on the fence. The following may be the first few steps in a scenario that comes next.
Flu season is upon us and comes every year from about October until about April.
Elections this year are November 8. Short of calling off the elections, no drastic totalitarian actions that might upset the electorate can take place until after November 8. Too many races are precariously being fought — races are in play throughout New England, New York, and even California. These are races once unimaginable for a Republican to win. Many officials in power are on guard right now not to be the one to blame for messing it all up. A week after the elections, or even a day after, is fair game however.
If, on November 15, 2022, Sacramento announced all California students had to be vaccinated against Covid-19 by January 15, 2023, there would be more compliance than if officials waited until the fall semester.
Electorally, the timing is perfect for the Governor. There is no election for two years, plus Newsom will be gone by then and will be untouchable to California voters. He will be a year away from that decision by the time his presidential campaign begins. in that regard, the sooner he makes that push, the better. His party’s radical base will laud him for that the decision, while the centrist voter will be told the decision had little to do with him and was out of his hands.
While there is much game to play, the 2024 election is increasingly looking like a Trump-Newsom contest. By Election Day 2024, it will be almost an entire 2 years since Newsom forced Covid shots on children — an eternity in our present media environment. Two years is enough time to also given anyone else embroiled in the mess enough time to recover.
With such a November 15, 2022 announcement, tired parents would 1.) be able to enjoy holidays or 2.) have to quit their jobs, reschedule life, move to another state, or otherwise scramble to find schooling options. Some parents will diligently accept this second option. Many will not, especially in the middle of a school year.
The default response, especially in the middle of a school year, is to just stay the course, enjoy the holidays, keep the kids in school, and allow them to take the shot. That is the more likely response that I suspect the majority of California parents will have. I do not want that to happen. I do not want a single additional child to take the unsafe and ineffective vaccine, but my wants may be divergent from reality.
This scenario creates a far different environment than if a shot is announced in April and the numerous involved parents can wait until August to sort these matters out. I do not know Newsom’s most important agenda items, but if childhood Covid vaccine compliance is among them, then spring semester 2023 is going to be much more effective for this goal than waiting until fall semester 2023.
Because parents are so busy, he just sets up vaccine clinics in the schools or near the schools. He can make compliance so very simple and any other option a total nightmare. This could be enough to get a few principled but exhausted parents to comply. It could be enough to break the back of a mass movement out of the schools.
At the same time, his government and the media may continue to blame Covid for the symptoms of vaccine injury, with increasingly shocking symptoms being announced by the news. We may hear that conditions children may face include: Sudden death, heart damage, seizures, reproductive issues, and increased risk of cancer. Keep pushing that narrative.
If I were Gavin Newsom and I cared about childhood vaccine compliance, that is what I would do: Vaccine mandates to attend school by MLK Day 2023.
And then on the other hand, he could lose a face off. And that is a loss that he must take into the equation. There is likely a double-digit percentage of parents who will not inject their children.
A mass movement of a double digit percentage of students out of the schools could break the backs of the California schools, teachers unions, pension system, and more. What a victory that would be — millions of children freed from the indoctrination camps we call schools.
It would also leave another bruise that Newsom will have to carry with him to the American public as he tells the story of what a success he is.
Newsom, though, does not suspect parents have the mettle to do that. Do you?
What do you think will happen? Comments below.
Gavin Newsom may do more to eradicate state schools than anyone else in California history. Think about it: if he cannot kill them by abortion, he'll do so my means of a forced mRNA shot.
Parents could always educate their own children. It was academia that convinced them they needed letters after their name to do so. And, what are their results? -- illiteracy, unemployablility, and crime.
I could help anyone get started to educate their offspring as soon as they accepted it as their responsiiblity to do so.
Can parents monitor classrooms? Under what laws and limitations? If parents monitor prior to mandates they might be able to send a very clear message that mandates are unacceptable (i.e. would come at a very high cost to Newsom in expenditure of political capital he would need in future). This could provoke a showdown BEFORE 8-NOV-2022 and force Newsom to commit one way or the other, pro-mandate or anti-mandate. That could make the issue as hot as if he had imposed a mandate before election day. Play it out. If he pays the price, now, for something he hasn't yet done, then, would he go ahead and do it anyway if he had presidential aspirations? Can this issue be run to ground and exhaust any potential advantages for a mandater and enliven the potential disadvantages? I dunno.