This appeared yesterday at my RealStevo.com https://realstevo.com/search newsletter — signup here to get a free guide on why and how to stop using Duck Duck Go. It also provides a list of two better, less censored alternatives. Everyone loved this piece and I got lots of exciting responses, so I’m sharing it here too.
Those who have done this get exactly what I mean.
To introduce that point, as some of your know, this week I am reading the classic novel Frankenstein in my trans-humanism book discussion group.
For the first two days of our discussion class, we have had the most mind-blowing ideas getting thrown around about modern life, things most people never even consider.
Even if you don’t read the book and just listen in on the ideas from the four-times a week recorded conversations, you will you will get far more than your money’s worth.
One group member said he got that on the first day.
Which brings me to the chem-trail topic I wanted to write you about …
This week we will keep reading Frankensteinand then we will turn to our next author. He is Ted Kaczynski, better known as the Unabomber.
Interesting guy,
Controversial ideas,
No one would listen to him,
or so the story goes —
So he started mailing bombs to “UN-iversities” and “A-irports,” (which is how he got his name UNA-Bomber from the FBI),
“The University and Airport Bomber,”
or so the story goes.
Anything you don’t experience first-hand deserves a lot of caveats in it, such as “or so the story goes,” cuz who really knows with the slippery fellows in government and media.
We will read two works from him in the class — his manifesto and his 2015 book.
His writing is particularly critical of technology and the bureaucrats and sociopaths who force it on us.
That kind of reading sort of makes sense for people who said “No!” to the medical interventions of 2020 and who might also believe that more may be coming, as I do.
Anyway . . .
The last section of his 2015 book talks about geo-engineering in its last pages. Could be interesting to hear what the Unabomber was saying about geo-engineering a decade ago from a federal penitentiary.
The guy cared enough, after all, about warning people like you and me about the dangers of technology that he started blowing people up in order to get your attention.
(Or so the story goes)
Geo-engineering, by the way, is the scientific term for chem-trail. If you look for research on chem-trails you find total garbage. Like you almost want to vomit because the things you find are so patently stupid.
On the other hand, if you look for research on geo-engineering, you find about fifty years of research on spraying junk in the air to change the weather.
That’s the word the scientists use: geo-engineering.
That alone is a good reason to NEVER say the word chem-trail again.
Your masters want you to keep using the word chem-trails, though.
They seem to have figured out that if they can get the public to use the word “chem-trail,” then they can keep the public in the dark, meanwhile the whole body of research on that topic can go on with thousands of scientists using the word “geo-engineering” — a real life code word for people in the know.
I’d prefer you be in the know, too.
It’s almost like the CIA rounds up people from mental institutions, puts them on special medicine to calm them down a little, and then pays them like a bajillion dollars to hunt down people like you or me for the purpose of endlessly mention chem-trails.
You’ve met those people.
The people who say the word “geo-engineering” are a different lot.
The CIA wants the idea of geo-engineering to be called “chem-trails” by you.
Because if that’s the word you use — chem-trails — you’ll never get at the truth.
Which is fine for some, since you might just be a member of the chattering classes, circulating links, watching endless videos, and never actually trying to get a real grasp of things. Getting a grasp of things requires knowing what your opponents views are, just as well, if not better than your opponents do.
That’s the reason I spend a lot of time reading work by people who aren’t like me. I want to get at the truth.
And the truth is, I don’t know the truth. I don’t know much about chem-trails, and that is after about 3 years of periodically looking for answers.
And then one day, I realized that chem-trails is the word crazy people use.
It’s a word meant to discredit anyone who dares ask if planes might be spraying something.
We’ll there’s something happening, and I expect no fewer than forty emails in my inbox in response to this in the morning and probably more like a hundred.
And I’ll personally read every one.
Cuz I like hearing from you.
And it makes me better — even the messages from wretched, hater trolls.
Yes, even you have a soft spot in my heart, dear wretched, hater troll.
And if this kind of talk about technology run amok interests you, technology that grows unchecked without ethical or moral protections around it . . .
If that interests you, you’re gonna love the first two days of class recordings (about 60 minutes each, though the second one went a few minutes longer)
And I suspect you are going to like the next 12 days of conversations ahead — not to mention the following two days of interviews we’ll get to do.
But anyway, if you don’t care about these things stay away.
And if you do care, get in.
Soon I’ll stop writing you about this and go do something else.
But as of right now, I know lots of great folks are missing out.
Because of my imperfect persuasion skills, what is probably the best class I’ve ever attended only has a few dozen folks involved.
Which is okay for me.
But it is a loss for you.
Anyway.
It has been a really good first two days of class (Thursday and Friday). Our next one will be this Tuesday.
Allan Stevo
I recently began reading Ted's book and it is eerie how prescient his observations were, even back in the 90s. I hate the tactics he used to call attention to the issues but I don't think his concerns were too far off. I highly recommend the book as a point of discussion on where things are headed and why.
I won't stop using the word 'chem-trails' because it describes much better the phenomenon than 'geo-engineering'. Just like 'conspiracy theory' the terms only mean something to people who've actually taken an incy-wincy-bit of time to research something other than being told what to think. Hell, at this juncture, I don't care if what I look into is a crock of shit or not, I'll look into it. It's like your suggestion of reading the Bible. I started....I gave up about Feb 24th or thereabouts, as I could see what I was reading was nothing more than a Jewish crock of shit. Moses? Abraham....then Israel....Do me a favour. This has as much to do with a divine creator as 'geo-engineering'. There is a God, of that much I'm sure........but it has nothing to do with the Bible which stinks of a man-made construct if I ever saw one. Having said that, there are probably some beautiful pieces of writing within the Bible, but never forget, to claim these are the 'words of God' is a big stretch. I'll give you a case in question. When Moses returns down the hill (the first time I think) and the plebs have been fornicating with false gods etc. and God says to Moses 'I'm going to wipe these people out'. Moses asks God to forgive them and change his mind, asking him to understand their stupidity or something and God changes his mind.......What? Crock of shit. I could go on but it really isn't worth my time to do so. I think I'll look for God in a place other than where somebody else is trying to direct me to.