Dear Reader,
The wearing of a face mask to protect against a respiratory virus is an act of grand deceit. It is a behavior that deifies research on the topic. Wearing a face mask, as this article (one of many) points to — is unsafe to do and is ineffective.
Until the narrative around mandatory masking has changed, each day by 6am Eastern, I will both post here and send out a science-based reason why no one should wear a face mask.
I ask that you help me circulate these pieces to those around you who you believe could most benefit from them. It is important not to remain silent on this topic. These are important discussions to be having with friends, family members, business owners, healthcare practitioners, public servants, and others in the community.
-Allan
The precautionary principal states that officials should err on the side of caution when mandating a health approach to one patient, or to a whole population.
It is rooted in the concept of medical ethics that a doctor is to do no harm. This goes back at least 2,500 years.1
That was done away with around the time of the Ides of March 2020. To this very moment, it has not been revived, though it is now abundantly apparent that Covid was not the great harm we were told it was going to be in March 2020.
Only with certainty that the cure will not be worse than the disease, does the precautionary principle let an ethical physician proceed. We learned in 2020 how few ethical physicians there were. They feigned expertise on things they knew nothing about. They do not today repent, and let us get past the harm of their lies, instead doubling down. They claim consensus of scientific opinion when the exact opposite is true, and they today censor those truth tellers who call them on their lies. They lied outright about the science, as well, and called upon their stenographers in the media to do the same, to this day not seeing to it that the record is corrected, instead leaving the greatest amount of rubbish and detritus out there to confuse any person with a diligent interest in deter mining the truth.
The time for calling this all a mistake has passed.
Nothing but the greatest malice is now behind the most pivotal events of our day, as unsafe and ineffective masks are pushed upon children alongside far worse unsafe and ineffective one-size-fits-all approaches.
Scientific knowledge was said to be lacking when this all began. That is a lie, and it is even more of a lie today.
There was dissent about the lockdown, the face masks, the mRNA shot from the first moment they were discussed.
Scientific knowledge was abundantly available, and those with the knowledge were promptly silenced.
Was the precautionary principle at least turned to? No. It was thrown out the window.
Bioethics writer Anne Zimmerman illustrates an argument that was used to entirely invert long standing medical ethics by claiming that the non-interventionist “do no harm,” now means all intervention can and must be taken by physicians, public health, and society as long as it is done in the name of preventing harm. Zimmerman argues:
“The precautionary principle in mask-wearing when waiting for explicit scientific evidence is unwise.”2
Medical ethics be damned. Why not just throw principle to the wind and do whatever we feel to a naive and trusting people.
A good reason not to do that is because when people figure out they have been had, they will want retribution.
The medical community thinks Americans do not have that in them. In February 2020, Denis Rancourt of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association wrote in “Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks,”3
“Following the precautionary principle, government has the onus to demonstrate absence of significant anticipated harm, prior to imposing a measure, especially with a personal medical measure applied to the general healthy population.
“The precautionary principle was not followed for masks in the Covid-19 pandemic.”
That can still be said today. Except, as the days go on, the evidence mounts that face masks are not safe and are not effective, yet policy makers double down stubbornly, showing they will be unwilling to back down until made to back down.
The time will soon come when they have no choice but to back down.
The Hippocratic Oath is approximately 2500 years old.
Zimmerman A. The precautionary principle in mask-wearing: when waiting for explicit scientific evidence is unwise. Voices in Bioethics. 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.7916/vib.v6i.5896
Rancourt, D.G. Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks, up to February 2021. 2021. Retrieved from https://assets.website-files.com/606d3a50c62e44338008303d/6076def5c5421e642472f1ef_5thsciencereview-masksharm-1.pdf
The bestselling book "Face Masks In One Lesson" by Allan Stevo describes how to never wear a face mask again. The follow-up to the book, "Face Masks Hurt Kids," describes why to never wear a face mask again. We must defeat the awful, narrative around the mandates.
Examples of how face masks hurt kids will be posted to the Lockdown Land Substack each morning by 6am Eastern until the narrative around this ineffective and harmful medical intervention has shifted. Face masks are, in fact, not just harmful to children. Face masks are harmful to everyone. Thank you so much for helping me circulate this research.
Makes me want to check what the loudest pro-mask voices have said about the application of the precautionary principle to PCR tests and Shots. Their rationalizations invert basic principles to shoehorn into the covidmania that launched a thousand lies.
It has been the pandemic of the masked, isolated, positively tested, and the shot-by-coercion.
Those who restrained themselves and lived by the precautionary principle through this nonsense are now belittled as "hesitant". Yet, synonym for hesitant is willing; and that means the opposite is unwilling. Informed refusal to go along with lies is not indecisive, not wabbly, not unsure. It is wise but also decisive, resolute, and determined.
The language of this so-called pandemic, this fraud perpetrated on an unsuspecting public, has been effective at creating confusion about everything except the demand that the "authorities" replace your will with their institutional will and thus make unwilling fools of all who'd comply with deceptions, coercion, and false sense of duty.
In such an upside down world, how can a person be non-hesitant and still retain and act on his own will? The all consuming narrative is a pack of lies.